<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12.0 Palettes &amp; Templates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/</link>
	<description>making Drupal7 an amazing user experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-672</guid>
		<description>I think these are great ideas.  I&#039;m not sure exactly how much work would be involved in implementing them. But if they&#039;re &quot;doable&quot;, this would add a great combination of *enjoyment* along with usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are great ideas.  I&#8217;m not sure exactly how much work would be involved in implementing them. But if they&#8217;re &#8220;doable&#8221;, this would add a great combination of *enjoyment* along with usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justinge</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Justinge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Thanks.
See! How these reactions like yours go!
Why do you insist on separate site? 
The links I gave are not separate sites but part of their core sites.
Probably such a section was never started in drupal.org becoz one of the reasons are the thoughts like yours!
FYI, birth of d7ux.org has quite a different story. Its useless going round here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.<br />
See! How these reactions like yours go!<br />
Why do you insist on separate site?<br />
The links I gave are not separate sites but part of their core sites.<br />
Probably such a section was never started in drupal.org becoz one of the reasons are the thoughts like yours!<br />
FYI, birth of d7ux.org has quite a different story. Its useless going round here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothstein</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Just to point out the (hopefully?) obvious: The d7ux.org site you&#039;re reading this on isn&#039;t anything official either; it was also built by ambitious community members who are trying to make Drupal better.

That said, I agree there are some very nice things about the sites you pointed to.  I don&#039;t know the circumstances under which the idea was &quot;rejected&quot; for drupal.org, but websites only get built if there are people willing/able to actually do the building... and like Robert said, it could easily start as a separate site (perhaps with lessons learned from other efforts, including this one?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to point out the (hopefully?) obvious: The d7ux.org site you&#8217;re reading this on isn&#8217;t anything official either; it was also built by ambitious community members who are trying to make Drupal better.</p>
<p>That said, I agree there are some very nice things about the sites you pointed to.  I don&#8217;t know the circumstances under which the idea was &#8220;rejected&#8221; for drupal.org, but websites only get built if there are people willing/able to actually do the building&#8230; and like Robert said, it could easily start as a separate site (perhaps with lessons learned from other efforts, including this one?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous for now</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous for now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-668</guid>
		<description>Drupal can use a &#039;feature requests&#039; category in its forums section.

I find it difficult to track different websites when one forum should be sufficient for ideas to improve drupal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drupal can use a &#8216;feature requests&#8217; category in its forums section.</p>
<p>I find it difficult to track different websites when one forum should be sufficient for ideas to improve drupal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justinge</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Justinge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Thanks and 
Just for the note 3 points
1.Ideas section can well apply to Drupal core
2.Forums , groups etc in drupal were not just built by any &quot;by some ambitious community member&quot;
3. Ideas section in Wordpress, MyBB and numerous other sites are just not built  &quot; by some ambitious community member&quot; - its part of their core websites and processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and<br />
Just for the note 3 points<br />
1.Ideas section can well apply to Drupal core<br />
2.Forums , groups etc in drupal were not just built by any &#8220;by some ambitious community member&#8221;<br />
3. Ideas section in WordPress, MyBB and numerous other sites are just not built  &#8221; by some ambitious community member&#8221; &#8211; its part of their core websites and processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Douglass</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Ah, I like those. I think something like that would be very beneficial. I also think it is something that could easily be built as a separate website NOW by some ambitious community member, and if it turns out to be valuable and popular, integrated into Drupal.org later. Please note that what Mark and Leisa are currently working on is NOT Drupal.org, but Drupal core (D7). 

I don&#039;t think anybody is trying to suppress anyone else&#039;s ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I like those. I think something like that would be very beneficial. I also think it is something that could easily be built as a separate website NOW by some ambitious community member, and if it turns out to be valuable and popular, integrated into Drupal.org later. Please note that what Mark and Leisa are currently working on is NOT Drupal.org, but Drupal core (D7). </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anybody is trying to suppress anyone else&#8217;s ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justinge</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Justinge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-665</guid>
		<description>If it has so many places then it brings back the old question why you need another half a dozen site like twitter, flickr, blogs etc to discuss stuffs ??
However, I am not asking that question.
Robert, what you pointed out are places to discuss existing codes, or ask some extra features on existing codes.
They are not categorically &quot;Idea&quot;s section or dedicated to just ideas like &quot;flying car&quot;
To understand what I said please look at the following uri and then say where there is such section in Drupal. 
wordpress.org/extend/ideas/
ideas.mybboard.net/

Requests for such section was turned down and now its irony that &quot;flying car&quot; ideas are solicited hErE !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it has so many places then it brings back the old question why you need another half a dozen site like twitter, flickr, blogs etc to discuss stuffs ??<br />
However, I am not asking that question.<br />
Robert, what you pointed out are places to discuss existing codes, or ask some extra features on existing codes.<br />
They are not categorically &#8220;Idea&#8221;s section or dedicated to just ideas like &#8220;flying car&#8221;<br />
To understand what I said please look at the following uri and then say where there is such section in Drupal.<br />
wordpress.org/extend/ideas/<br />
ideas.mybboard.net/</p>
<p>Requests for such section was turned down and now its irony that &#8220;flying car&#8221; ideas are solicited hErE !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Douglass</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-664</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t follow you. Drupal.org has a forum where you can post ideas. It has an issue queue where you can report bugs or request features. It has groups.drupal.org where you can organize working groups. It has an aggregator where you can ask to have your Drupal related blog posts aggregated. There is no shortage of places to post your ideas. Can you please clarify a bit? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t follow you. Drupal.org has a forum where you can post ideas. It has an issue queue where you can report bugs or request features. It has groups.drupal.org where you can organize working groups. It has an aggregator where you can ask to have your Drupal related blog posts aggregated. There is no shortage of places to post your ideas. Can you please clarify a bit? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justinge</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Justinge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Many scripts like Wordpress, My BB have dedicated forum or section where community members or just any one can post &quot;Ideas&quot;. 
Request for such was turned down or not responded in Drupal many times.
Paying or inviting MB for &#039;ideas&#039; and refusing the community&#039;s &#039;Ideas&#039; idea may appear to some as dubious standard or dictator like negligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many scripts like WordPress, My BB have dedicated forum or section where community members or just any one can post &#8220;Ideas&#8221;.<br />
Request for such was turned down or not responded in Drupal many times.<br />
Paying or inviting MB for &#8216;ideas&#8217; and refusing the community&#8217;s &#8216;Ideas&#8217; idea may appear to some as dubious standard or dictator like negligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Static images don't do justice to such dynamic features</title>
		<link>http://www.d7ux.org/palettes/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Static images don't do justice to such dynamic features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d7ux.org/?p=171#comment-661</guid>
		<description>I struggled with this concept at first to.  Then I was fortunate enough to see Mark draw it out and share his thoughts.  It seemed pretty natural actually.  I now think Drupal would really benefit from such a feature.  I think when Mark and Leisa take this to the next level and show a working prototype of it, it will blow users away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggled with this concept at first to.  Then I was fortunate enough to see Mark draw it out and share his thoughts.  It seemed pretty natural actually.  I now think Drupal would really benefit from such a feature.  I think when Mark and Leisa take this to the next level and show a working prototype of it, it will blow users away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
